Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus  Last time I checked the PS3 specs it was a single core cell based processor clocking in a 3.4ghz.
Dual Quad Cores. at 3.4ghz. Lol. Okay, why would sony, as shitty as it is, be closer to 3.4ghz on a quad core then AMD or Intel. Thats pretty funny. Because firstly it doesn't fucking exist. Look up your shit before you try to say other wise. And oh, my bad, my shitty ATI cards I mean, noticing that GDDR4 is the highest memory state released as of now, and that I know for a fact your cell based shit cant come close to my benchmarks of my cards. Haha, not only that, but who fucking cares if it runs my cards down, get a fucking job, do you think a couple hundred dollars dieing after years of usuage even though the video cards price would drop hurts me? And let me correct myself even further, the only tests proven would show that Over Clocking would die it out faster. Wooo the PS3 has a total of 512mb of ddr3 ram! Z0mg n33b h4x pl0xz!!! Thats ultra pwn4g3. No just no, thats shittyier then south parks city wok. Now listen you dumb pieces of freaking shit, do you really think a 3.4ghz single based "cell" core could dominate my 2x 2.2ghz Quad Cores, (add up the clocks, just do it.) Yeah nevermind of course you were going to think that because let me rephrase myself, your stupid. (Maybe I should use retarded but er mite ofens yew)
Stupid - lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind; dull.
Oh boy, you can run a PS3 in 1080pi HD Woohwwwhhhhhh z0mg n33b h4x0rz pll0xzpl0xz. Ok no, I would have to consider anything in the DX10 fields on a pci-e16x config about 256mb with a 64mem bit to be 1080pi stating the difference between a monitor and a tv, it might be over doing it, but no, let me see, 1gb total GDDR4 graphics crossfired at 128bits and 32 pixel pipelines, if you even caught any of that, its equivalency is of 1/4 the processing power of the cards, but like I said the crossfired combination would have to increase that by atleast 10% being fair,statistically 25%~. So more 1/5 the power. I'm not trying to confuse anyone but if you don't understand basic math, then damn, get the fuck out.
Sorry for the crude and almost upsetting language, it only seems right to teach the most ignorant.
Ryuken, you're just as bad as anyone else, please go die. |
I had to sign up just to LOL @ this guy
My 3.2ghz dual core plays 99.9999% of games in existence faster than your 8 2.2ghz cores. I don't say 100% because I don't know if there's a new game that came out that uses a quad-core.
But either way, you don't add up core speeds retard.
So until your rendering images in Photoshop, or running benchmarks, your 8 core system is a theoretical powerhouse, and an actual waste of money.
And your idiotic rant about crossfire, I couldn't even understand it, but if your telling me that running the cards in crossfire adds 10-25% to each card, then HAHAHAHHA
You don't actually get DOUBLE performance because you put TWO cards, let alone more than double lol