Did anyone else find Worlds at war campaign to short?
|
|
4
5
|
Did anyone else find Worlds at war campaign to short?
I felt that 4 was really short. 5 was meh.
they are pretty much the same game, one is modern the other is 1940's...
over all i like playing old school so i went with cod5...
but nothing can beat the golden child of ww2.... Call Of Duty 2!!
id go for Call of Duty 4 cuz its unique vs all the other cod games. All of them are about ww2. But cod5 has zombie mod so that kinda equals it out
it was the same lol. the reason 5 came out so fast was because it was a reskin and dubbed version of 4![]()
zombie nazi is the real reason i bought COD5
ww2 is over... I guess I can return to my grave...
haha, I cant stand the guns from ww2,
CoD4 ftw. Should'a made a poll, "What's your favorite Prestige icon?".
the hole prestige thing i just don't understand
i own cod 5 but i prefer cod4 !modern warfare...aparently there a cod 4 part 2 coming out
I like Prestige 9. But it's not entirely true about the no life = high prestige thing. I've had CoD4 since the day it came out, and I usually only play my PS3 for about 1-3 hours a day. And I have had three accounts over the course of that time, one was a Prestige 10, another was a Prestige 4, and then my recent account is just those two silver bars.
COD 4 since its modernwarfare
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |