Thread: AT&T willing to spy for NSA, MPAA, and RIAA

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1 AT&T willing to spy for NSA, MPAA, and RIAA 
    Senior Member PSP Elite Hacker
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,215
    http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070...a-and-riaa.html

    [spoiler]AT&T willing to spy for NSA, MPAA, and RIAA

    By Nate Anderson | Published: June 13, 2007 - 10:13AM CT

    In a move that has executives from movie studios and record labels grinning from ear to ear, AT&T has announced that it will develop and deploy technology that will attempt to keep pirated content off its network. The move is spurred in part by the company's decision to offer IPTV television service as part of its U-Verse package, AT&T senior VP James W. Cicconi told the Los Angeles Times.

    The first step for AT&T is coming up with a technological solution that works: something that can effectively filter out illicit traffic while protecting its users' privacy. That's a tall?if not impossible?order. YouTube hasn't managed to do it even for video yet, and that's when customers are sending them entire files which they can scan at their leisure. Monitoring all the files sent through BitTorrent?which splits them into tiny pieces?could be even more difficult; doing it in real-time sounds both expensive and impossible.

    Without human intervention, it's also tough to tell if copyrighted content is even "piracy." Fair use carves out exceptions for news reporting, criticism, and commentary (among other things) which is nearly impossible for a machine to understand in context.

    Despite the major technical problems inherent in such a program, AT&T is moving ahead. By making themselves into the arbiters of copyright law, the company risks being drawn into a costly "arms race" with programmers who don't like the idea of a massive corporation (and one which appears to have turned over information to the NSA) peeking into their packets and deciding which ones go through.

    This is exactly the situation that Dr. Greg Jackson, CIO of the University of Chicago, warned Congress about last week. "The only successful, robust way to address problems that involve personal responsibility and behavior is with social rather than technological tools," he said in a hearing. "If we instead try and restrict behavior technologically... the only result will be an arms race that nobody wins."

    There's a certain creepiness to having one of the country's largest IP networks doing deep packet inspection and monitoring, but consumers who value their privacy can always go somewhere else, right? Not necessarily. In addition to running a massive network of its own, AT&T runs a good chunk of the backbone infrastructure in the US. It's a rare bit of traffic that can make it to its destination without passing on to an AT&T-owned network. If the company deploys its anti-piracy technology to all data passing through its networks, AT&T's "solution" could affect most US Internet users. In addition, many US residents have limited broadband choices.

    The company says it will target only repeat offenders and that it will not violate user privacy or FCC directives on network openness. Who knows how this is all supposed to work, especially as legal, unencrypted files flow across the Internet from sites like iTunes and eMusic, along with thousands of smaller sites that serve as promotional vehicles for independent bands and filmmakers? We suspect that AT&T will start small, deploying some sort of P2P solution that looks for the transfer of unencrypted Hollywood blockbusters and major-label bands in complete form.

    The most likely scenario is the deployment of new traffic-shaping hardware that can tell what protocol is being used by watching packets (but without doing deep inspection). Only those using BitTorrent, FTP, or other targeted protocols would receive deeper scrutiny; e-mail and web requests should remain private in such a system. Given AT&T's size, though, even in an almost-perfect system could cause problems. Assuming (and this is a big assumption) that whatever solution they roll out works with 99.5 percent accuracy, then AT&T will still have a 0.5 percent false positive rate. That's pretty good, but 0.5 percent of a gazillion users is still plenty of users. The company's focus on "repeat offenders" may be a way of avoiding this problem by only flagging users who share illicit files multiple times and are unlikely to be falsely flagged in every case.

    All of this appears to be in the talking stages for the moment, though, so we'll have to wait awhile to find out exactly how Big Brother-ish it turns out to be. What it does indicate is that AT&T, once just a network provider, has recognized the importance of content to its own business. "We do recognize that a lot of our future business depends on exciting and interesting content," Cicconi told the Times. [/spoiler]

    If your internet service provider is AT&T and you do lots of downloading, then you want to switch to another ISP as soon as possible. Even if you don't, you might still want to switch just because AT&T won't respect your privacy. :mad:
    Hopefully the word gets out and AT&T suffers for this ridiculous idea.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 AT&T willing to spy for NSA, MPAA, and RIAA 
    Senior Member I Modded My PSP
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    362
    <span style="color:DarkOrchid">Wow, they're really getting tight about this crap. I hope it never becomes mandatory that a ISP will have to watch what it's users actually do. Total invasion of privacy and a big part of your freedom while using the internet. They should actually try and target the distributors of illegal torrents for once instead of just dicking around the whole subject and going after users with scare tactics.

    It's just like the drug market, you won't get anywhere trying to stomp out the buyers of drugs, you've got to cut it off at it's source. And if you can't kill the source then tough luck, because the s*** is going to spread, and sooner or later all you're going to have IS going to be scare tactics. I just consider this a nice, big, fat one.</span>
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 AT&T willing to spy for NSA, MPAA, and RIAA 
    Senior Member PSP Mad Hacker
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    986
    Oh, the NSA sees and hears it all anyway, permission or not... AT&T being willing just means they can arrest using information obtained from monitoring with no legal consequence on their end.

    As for the MPAA and RIAA..my ISP, Bellsouth, merged with AT&T recently. Guess I'm going to have to switch to Time Warner now :P Oh well, atleast it'll be a speed upgrade.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 AT&T willing to spy for NSA, MPAA, and RIAA 
    Senior Member PSP Elite Hacker
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,215
    If you switch to Time Warner, make sure you do your downloading at off-peak hours. They just started packet shaping, though hopefully they don't have any of the intentions AT&T has.
    If you can, then switch to Verizon. They refuse to spy on their customers, unlike AT&T.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 AT&T willing to spy for NSA, MPAA, and RIAA 
    Senior Member PSP Mad Hacker
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    986
    I'll have to check into Verizon, but I don't know if they provide service here or not, I've never looked into it before. Still, I don't mind having the problems with peak hours as long as my ass isn't going to jail >_> I do most of my downloading overnight in the AM, too.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 AT&T willing to spy for NSA, MPAA, and RIAA 
    Senior Member I Modded My PSP
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    362
    <span style="color:DarkOrchid">Time Warner is good, even after the changes...I let my downloads go overnight though, and games still have great latency. I sure hope they don't pull an AT&T, they're pretty much the best around here and I'd hate to have to find another. >.<</span>
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •