the term "call of duty" is for ever entwined with world war 2 why wouldn't a game with that name be based on it. cod4 was ok. i liked the game play but yes the story was idiotic.
im going to give my thought on life... every one should server at least 1 enlistment in a branch of military service. and those that carry signs saying " thank god for ied's" or tell those fighting for a country's rights.. " the rights they didn't have because there dictator was mutilating them... the rights that most Americans take for granted..." ( yes the government probably has a few extra motives for being in the middle east im not denying that.) the people that tell those surviving the the military to there face "fuck you" should be drafted. but the main reason to be there is still the same.. people in Iraq would wake up and have to chose whether or not they where going to go out side today. because they had a high chance of being killed. when most Americans wake up and decide. do i want milk or oj with my waffles. do you think that those in Iraq right now. us citizens and not, get to make a simple choice like that.
any way back to the topic.
if you are tired of playing ww2 games.... ( this is real easy ) ...............
the problem with COD4 was it had too much attention. fanboys gathered around the case of the game and cummed all over it. then they called themselves COD fans to the death. its bullshit, ive played earlier COD's then the 4th was just falling into the crowd with the rest of the fps's on the market
i hate WWII because its been beaten to death. Do we really need another WWII game?
Most shooters are either in the past or future. I liked playing something modern.
COD5 is going to be...
Linear Mode
